District attorneys don’t seem especially interested in prosecuting violations of our open government laws. And the expense of suing public agencies over meeting and records violations is prohibitive for most folks.
But another option exists for persuading at least some of those public officials to respect Oklahomans’ right to know what their government is doing.
File a complaint with the Oklahoma Bar Association against lawyers serving on public bodies that violate the Open Meeting Act and against those government attorneys providing advice that clearly contradicts the Open Meeting and Open Records laws.
“Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of lawyers,” according to the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers. (OKLA. STAT. tit. 5 app. 3-A, § 8.4 cmt. 5)
Protecting the public is the primary purpose of the lawyer discipline system, the Oklahoma Bar Association notes.
The OBA investigates complaints of unethical conduct by lawyers practicing in the state. Lawyers found guilty of serious misconduct may be suspended or disbarred.
The rules "apply to lawyers who are not active in the practice of law" and to "practicing lawyers even when they are acting in a nonprofessional capacity. For example, a lawyer who commits fraud in the conduct of a business is subject to discipline for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation." (OKLA. STAT. tit. 5 app. 3-A, § Preamble(3))
"A lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in professional service to clients and in the lawyer's business and personal affairs." (Id. 5)
The OBA's examples of unethical conduct include when "a lawyer doesn’t tell the truth."
Lawyers may serve on public bodies as either elected or appointed members.
A complaint against a lawyer serving on a public body that clearly violates the Open Meeting Act would seem justified under the following Rules of Professional Conduct:
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:Those rules also would seem to justify a complaint against attorneys whose advice to public bodies and agencies clearly contradicts our state's Open Records and Open Meeting laws.
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation. (OKLA. STAT. tit. 5 app. 3-A, § 8.4 cmt. 2)
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; (OKLA. STAT. tit. 5 app. 3-A, § 8.4)
Such advice by these attorneys -- whether employed directly by a government body to render it legal advice or a private attorney hired as an independent contractor to render legal advice to a government body or agency -- would also seem to violate another Rule of Professional Conduct:
A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent....(Rule 1.2. (d))(["A] lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law." Id.)
When any of these lawyers -- whether as members of public bodies or as government attorneys -- try to cover up their wrongdoing, they would likely violate the rules by:
- Engaging in "conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; (OKLA. STAT. tit. 5 app. 3-A, § 8.4(c))
- Knowingly making "a false statement of material fact or law to a third person"; or
- Knowlingly failing to "disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6." (OKLA. STAT. tit. 5 app. 3-A, § 4.1(a-b))
The complaint must be in writing and signed. A form is not required, but an OBA complaint form is available.
The complaint must be an original document mailed or delivered to the Oklahoma Bar Association:
- ATTN: General Counsel P.O. Box 53036 Oklahoma City, OK 73152
The nature of the complaint should be described in full detail, including dates. Include copies, not originals, of any documents that could help the Office of the General Counsel understand the complaint.
The Office of the General Counsel will review the information and may decide to:
- Open an investigation
- Ask you to provide more information
- Notify you that the office can take no action
According to the OBA:
If an investigation is opened, you will be notified in writing and when necessary will be contacted by an investigator or attorney.If you file such a complaint, please let me know.
A copy of your complaint will be sent to the attorney, who will be asked to respond in writing.
Even if an investigation is not opened, you will still be notified. A copy of your complaint will be forwarded to the attorney for his or her information.
If an investigation is conducted and the state bar decides there is probable cause to think the attorney violated ethics rules and there is clear and convincing evidence to show the violation, formal disciplinary action may be initiated. All state bar investigations are confidential. A hearing may be held, and you may be required to appear as a witness.
Joey Senat, Ph.D.
OSU School of Media & Strategic Communications